TECHNOLOGY DUE DILIGENCE

How comprehensive technical assessment protects your investment and drives transaction success

What Is Technology Due Diligence?

Technology Due Diligence (TDD) is the comprehensive, systematic evaluation of a target company's entire technological landscape before completing an M&A transaction or investment.

Unlike narrower technical assessments, TDD examines the full spectrum of technology assets and capabilities:

Products and software - Code quality, architecture, scalability
IT infrastructure - Hardware, networks, cloud solutions, data centers
Intellectual property - Patents, copyrights, licensing compliance
Security and compliance - Cybersecurity posture, regulatory adherence
Technical processes - Development methodologies, operational practices
Technical personnel - Team capabilities, knowledge concentration, retention risks

TDD functions as a critical "health check" for the technology stack, ensuring it is reliable, secure, scalable, and ready to support future growth and strategic objectives.

The fundamental question TDD answers: "Is the technology foundation solid enough to support our investment thesis and deliver projected returns?"

‍

Why Technology Due Diligence Is a Competitive Imperative

The Cost of Inadequate Technical Assessment

Technology failures post-acquisition are shockingly common—and devastatingly expensive:

Hidden infrastructure costs requiring emergency $10M+ upgrades immediately post-close
Security breaches within the first year destroying customer trust and triggering regulatory fines
Scalability failures preventing the company from capitalizing on market opportunities
Key person departures taking all technical knowledge with them
IP litigation from overlooked licensing violations or ownership disputes
Integration disasters requiring complete platform rebuilds

The ROI of Comprehensive TDD

Consider the math: A thorough TDD engagement typically costs $75K-$250K depending on company size and complexity—representing less than 0.1% of most transaction values.

Compare that to:

Unbudgeted technical remediation costs averaging $5M-$15M
Valuation write-downs of 20-40% when technical realities emerge post-close
Failed integrations requiring $20M+ in emergency re-platforming
Deal abandonment after investing months and millions in the process

The return on investment isn't marginal—it's exponential. TDD doesn't cost money; it saves money and protects value.

The Strategic Benefits of TDD Across Stakeholder Roles

For Private Equity Investors

Your challenge: Deploy significant capital into technology-dependent businesses without deep technical expertise on your investment team.

How TDD delivers value:

Validates investment thesis - Confirms technology can actually deliver projected growth and returns
Quantifies hidden costs - Surfaces technical debt and infrastructure needs affecting ROI calculations
Protects downside - Identifies deal-breakers before committing capital
Informs value creation plan - Pinpoints technical improvement opportunities for portfolio company growth
Supports exit strategy - Ensures technology will withstand due diligence from future acquirers

For Corporate Development Executives

Your challenge: Execute strategic acquisitions that integrate successfully and deliver promised synergies.

How TDD delivers value:

Enables accurate valuation - Provides technical data for precise valuation adjustments
Identifies integration risks - Maps technical compatibility and integration complexity
Supports negotiation strategy - Uncovers leverage points for price or term adjustments
Accelerates integration planning - Creates clear roadmap for technical consolidation
Mitigates post-close surprises - Eliminates technical unknowns that derail integration

For Board Members and Senior Executives

Your challenge: Provide governance oversight and approve transactions with confidence that technical risks are adequately assessed.

How TDD delivers value:

Risk transparency - Clear view of technical risks and their business impact
Informed decision-making - Objective technical assessment from independent experts
Liability protection - Demonstrates fiduciary responsibility and proper diligence
Strategic alignment validation - Confirms technology supports long-term strategic objectives
Post-acquisition oversight - Establishes baseline for monitoring technical integration progress

‍

The Five Pillars of Comprehensive Technology Due Diligence

Effective TDD evaluates the target across five interconnected dimensions, often summarized as the "Three P's Plus Two" framework: People, Processes, Technology, plus Security and IP.

1. Product and Architectural Viability

What we assess:

This is the deep technical dive into the product itself—the software, systems, and technical design that deliver customer value.

Code Quality and Technical Debt:

Codebase maintainability, performance, and adherence to standards
Accumulated technical debt quantified in remediation hours and costs
Testing coverage (unit, integration, end-to-end)
Bug density and defect rates
Development velocity and feature delivery speed

Architectural Assessment:

Design paradigm (monolithic vs. microservices vs. serverless)
Scalability characteristics and growth capacity
Modularity and maintainability of architectural design
Technology stack currency and supportability
Integration capabilities with external systems

Scalability and Performance:

System capacity to handle increased user loads
Database architecture and data growth handling
Performance under stress conditions
Horizontal and vertical scaling capabilities

Why it matters: The product architecture determines whether the technology can actually scale to meet growth projections. A monolithic architecture that works for 10,000 users may require complete re-architecture at 500,000 users—a multi-million dollar surprise if not identified during diligence.

Red flags to watch for:

Technical debt exceeding 30% of total codebase effort
Outdated technology stack with no modernization plan
Single-threaded architecture preventing horizontal scaling
Absence of automated testing (manual QA only)
Poor code documentation and unclear architectural patterns

2. Infrastructure and Operational Readiness

What we assess:

The underlying infrastructure that supports the product—hardware, networks, cloud environments, and operational systems.

Infrastructure Components:

Cloud solutions - AWS, Azure, GCP configurations and optimization
Data centers - Physical infrastructure, power, cooling, connectivity (if applicable)
Networking - Network architecture, bandwidth, latency, redundancy
Hardware - Servers, storage, compute resources (for on-premises environments)

Operational Metrics:

Uptime and reliability - Historical availability metrics (SLA achievement)
Performance - Latency, response times, throughput under load
Redundancy - Failover capabilities, backup systems, disaster recovery
Monitoring and alerting - Observability tools, incident detection, response time
Cost efficiency - Infrastructure spend optimization, waste identification

Critical Documentation:

Architectural diagrams (network topology, system architecture)
Development and deployment pipelines (CI/CD processes)
Disaster recovery and business continuity plans
Capacity planning and growth projections
Vendor contracts and SLA agreements

Why it matters: Infrastructure is the foundation everything else sits on. Inadequate infrastructure means the business physically cannot scale, regardless of market opportunity. Lack of operational redundancy means a single failure can take down the entire business.

Red flags to watch for:

Single point of failure in critical systems (no redundancy)
Uptime below 99.9% with frequent unexplained outages
No formal disaster recovery plan or untested backups
Infrastructure running at >80% capacity with no expansion plan
Manual deployment processes without automation

3. Security and Regulatory Compliance

What we assess:

Cybersecurity posture and regulatory compliance adherence—arguably the highest-risk area in modern TDD.

Security Assessment:

Access controls - Multi-factor authentication, role-based access, privileged account management
Data protection - Encryption at rest and in transit, key management
Vulnerability management - Patch management, security scanning, penetration testing
Threat detection and response - Security monitoring, incident response procedures
Security policies and training - Documented policies, employee security awareness

Regulatory Compliance:

GDPR - Data protection for European customers
CCPA - California consumer privacy requirements
HIPAA - Healthcare information protection (if applicable)
SOC 2 - Security, availability, and confidentiality controls
PCI DSS - Payment card data security (if applicable)
Industry-specific regulations - Financial services, government, etc.

Compliance Documentation:

Current compliance certifications and audit reports
Data handling and privacy policies
Compliance monitoring and remediation processes
Third-party security assessments
Breach history and incident response records

Why it matters: A single security breach post-acquisition can devastate customer trust, trigger regulatory fines, and destroy deal value. Non-compliance isn't just a technical issue—it's a legal and financial liability that can dwarf the acquisition price. Cybersecurity is non-negotiable.

Red flags to watch for:

No formal security program or security leadership
Lack of encryption for sensitive data
No penetration testing or security audits in past 12 months
Previous data breaches or security incidents
Missing required compliance certifications for the industry
Unpatched critical vulnerabilities

4. Intellectual Property (IP) and Licensing

What we assess:

Legal ownership and protection of intangible assets, plus compliance with third-party licensing obligations.

IP Ownership Verification:

Patents - Validity, scope, expiration dates, litigation history
Copyrights - Code ownership, proper assignment from developers/contractors
Trademarks - Brand protection, registration status
Trade secrets - Confidential information protection measures
Employment agreements - IP assignment clauses for all technical staff

Third-Party and Open-Source Software:

Dependency scanning - Automated scan of entire codebase to identify all third-party components
License identification - Categorization of all software licenses (permissive vs. copyleft)
Attribution report - Comprehensive listing of all dependencies and their licenses
License compliance - Verification that usage complies with license terms
Viral license risk - Identification of GPL or other copyleft licenses that could require open-sourcing proprietary code

Vendor and Partner Agreements:

Software licensing agreements with third-party vendors
Technology partnership agreements
Reseller or distribution agreements affecting IP rights

Why it matters: You cannot legally sell, monetize, or even fully control technology you don't actually own. Open-source license violations can force you to open-source your proprietary code or face costly litigation. IP issues are binary: they either exist cleanly, or they're deal-breakers.

Red flags to watch for:

Unclear IP ownership (contractors without assignment agreements)
GPL or AGPL usage in proprietary codebase (viral license risk)
Pending or active IP litigation
Use of "cracked" or unlicensed commercial software
Missing patent protection for core innovations
Expired patents on critical technologies

5. Team Capabilities and Development Processes

What we assess:

The human element—the people, organizational structure, and processes that create and maintain the technology.

Team Structure and Capabilities:

Organizational design - Reporting structure, roles, and responsibilities
Technical expertise - Depth and breadth of skills across the technology stack
Team size and composition - Engineers, QA, DevOps, security, etc.
Retention and turnover - Historical attrition rates, pending departures
Key person risk - Over-reliance on individual contributors (single point of failure)
Compensation and culture - Market competitiveness, satisfaction, engagement

Development Methodologies:

Process maturity - Agile, Scrum, Kanban, or ad-hoc approaches
Version control - Git workflows, branching strategies, code review processes
CI/CD practices - Automated testing, deployment pipelines, release frequency
Quality assurance - Testing strategy, QA team, defect management
DevOps maturity - Infrastructure as code, monitoring, incident management

Knowledge Management:

Technical documentation - Architecture docs, API documentation, runbooks
Code documentation - Inline comments, README files, onboarding materials
Knowledge transfer plans - Succession planning for critical roles
Tribal knowledge assessment - How much critical knowledge exists only in people's heads

Why it matters: Technology doesn't run itself—people build, maintain, and evolve it. A major red flag is over-reliance on one or two key individuals who hold all proprietary knowledge. If they leave post-acquisition, you've bought an orphaned codebase nobody understands. Proper documentation and knowledge distribution are vital for business continuity.

Red flags to watch for:

Single point of failure: one or two people understand the entire system
High recent turnover (>30% annually) in technical roles
Key technical leaders planning to leave post-acquisition
Weak or absent technical documentation
Ad-hoc development processes with no formal methodology
No code review or quality assurance processes
Team skills misaligned with technology stack (e.g., junior team maintaining complex distributed system)

‍